Badham’s Vote on Two Issues
- Share via
The Roll Call column that The Times regularly publishes is certainly a valuable service to the voters of Orange County. It provides a clear and concise way to see how the local congressmen voted on controversial issues.
However, in a recent column, I was listed as not voting on two issues that I feel very strongly about. In fact, during the voting on these issues on April 30, I was temporarily forced to leave the House floor because of a minor medical problem. When I returned a few minutes after the vote ended, I entered the way I would have voted for the record.
On the Republican substitute to the trade bill, I would have voted yes. On the highly protectionist trade bill itself, I would have voted no. Both of these votes were decided by large margins, so my vote was not critical. On the potentially disastrous Gephardt Amendment, which passed 218-214, I was on the floor and I voted no.
ROBERT E. BADHAM
Member of Congress
40th District
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
