Al Gore

Re “Struggle With Conscience Was Gore’s Biggest Vietnam Battle,” Oct. 15: I always admired journalists for placing themselves in some of the most dangerous sites to report news. And as a Vietnam-era veteran, I know a war zone is no exception. Therefore, I find it ironic that The Times would belittle Al Gore’s Vietnam duty.

One day or five months in a war zone as a soldier or journalist doesn’t change the reality of the unexpected casualties of war. Frankly, Gore’s conscience struggles may be just what America needs today. And as for the fortunate few in America, even underprivileged parents would do anything in their power to protect their loved ones.

I wonder, if Vice President Gore had lost his life in Vietnam, would The Times consider him a brave soldier or just another journalist killed in the line of fire?

ART GOMEZ

San Gabriel

*

Who really wrote the story about Gore’s conscience? His campaign manager or his mother? With lines like, “His deliberations show the slow and painstaking approach that has become a trademark of his decision-making style as a political leader,” the story obviously belongs at best on the opinion pages. And since when was Gore ever known for his decision-making of any kind? At best, his decision-making is painstaking to observe.

FRANK ST. DENIS

Morro Bay

*

On Oct. 16 and Oct. 17 The Times printed two articles describing Gore’s current dilemma. Should President Clinton be allowed to join and be part of his presidential campaign? Unfortunately, The Times buried both these articles deep in the first section instead of them being printed on the front page.

As a Republican, I can only smile at Gore’s problem. As an American, I find Gore’s situation an embarrassment.

DENNIS MARTIN

Whittier